Contact

Your goldmine is already in your own database

I regularly look at the logs of our integrations. Not because something is broken, but because it's fascinating to see how applications flow. Where they come from, where they go, and especially: who comes back. Because that's the strange thing. Applications continuously come in from people who were already in that database before. Sometimes from last year. Sometimes from three years ago. Neatly registered then, easily found by email address. And now they're just there again. As if they're visiting for the first time.

Image

The most expensive leak in recruitment is not in your funnel

Everyone in recruitment knows the ritual. New vacancy, first step: place an ad. Indeed Sponsored, Google Ads, maybe LinkedIn if the budget allows. Makes sense, right? You need reach, volume, fresh candidates.

But here's the strange part. The average cost to hire someone is now around $4,700. For managerial positions, even towards $35,000. Those numbers have more than doubled in ten years. And yet the reflex remains: pump more money into new channels.

Meanwhile, your own database grows every year with hundreds or thousands of profiles. People who once took the trouble to apply, write a motivation letter, come for an interview. And after being rejected, they never hear anything again.

The ice is already broken

Here's the crux that everyone misses. With a cold lead from a job board, you still have to earn everything. The attention, the trust, the interest. With someone in your own database, that's already happened. That person once consciously chose to apply to your organization. That's no small thing.

Research from Indeed shows that 64% of candidates say they want to maintain the relationship, even if they were not hired. Read that again. Two out of three people would like you to keep in touch. And what do most agencies do? Silence.

Greenhouse published last year that 61% of candidates have been ghosted after a job interview. That percentage increases every year. The standard in recruitment is not "we keep in touch". The standard is "we ignore you after the rejection".

And precisely therein lies the opportunity.

The closet in the garage

I often think of it this way: you rent your ATS. You rent your job boards. You rent your advertising channels. The only asset that truly belongs to you are the candidates in your own database. With their history, their preferences, their contact moments. That's the only thing that travels with you if you switch tools tomorrow.

And we treat it like a closet in the garage. We know there's something valuable in it, but it's easier to go to the store than to take a moment to search.

No mass mailing, no rocket science

I'm not calling for anyone to send a bulk email to three thousand old candidates tomorrow. That's spam, it doesn't work, it costs you your reputation.

But this: one candidate per day. Targeted. With a specific vacancy that matches what they showed before. That's an hour of work per week. Personal, relevant, and with context you already have.

The data supports this. Multiple touchpoints over time yield 35 to 50% lower costs per qualified candidate than one-time contact. Companies like Talend fill three-quarters of their vacancies from their own pipeline, including people who were previously not chosen.

"But our database is outdated"

That's the most heard counterargument. And it's partly true. Not everyone in your database is still available. But it doesn't have to be. If 30 to 50% are still open for a conversation, and your email costs you nothing, then mathematically it's a no-brainer.

The other frequently heard argument is GDPR. But the GDPR allows you to contact existing candidates for similar positions. If someone has explicitly opted out, then no. Otherwise, yes. In 90% of cases, this is simply allowed.

The uncomfortable truth

Recruiters think in "fresh leads" because it's sexy. Because the suppliers sell that. Because a new lead has a clear beginning, a click, an application, a CV. It feels like progress.

Sending an email to someone from three years ago feels like going back. But it's not. It's the opposite. It's the cheapest, warmest, most relevant pipeline you have.

You don't need to build a system for it. Start with an experiment. Open your database, find ten people who previously applied for a position you now have open, and send them a personal message. See what happens.

When was the last time you sent a message to someone from your own database?